I didn't look at the pics, but I've seen plenty of objectionable stuff on Weblo's auto-generated pages that I probably don't need to.
It's just poor filtering in whatever mechanism they use to gather images for the pages. They either need to tune it properly or employ someone to 'scan' the pages for objectionable content (like stuff that violates their own TOS!). A person could probably scan 1,000 or more pages in a work day for images that should be removed and kick the bad ones to a queue where someone is edits them and saves the changes.
Ideally this should be done before publishing the pages, but I bet a small team could clean up quite a few pages in a matter of days or weeks.